I would like to go back to a quite delicate question of commutative algebra, that of associated prime ideals of modules. In most textbooks (Bourbaki, Matsumura…), this concept is considered for modules over a noetherian ring, while it is also necessary to consider it in a greater generality for some applications in algebraic geometry. For my book, (Mostly) commutative algebra (Springer Nature, 2021), I preferred to introduce the general concept (§6.5), because I observed that the initial proofs are in fact easier. In yesterday's class (Cohomology of coherent sheaves, 2nd year of Master course at Université Paris Cité), some remarks of a student, Elias Caeiro, helped me simplify two steps of the treatment I proposed in my book.
Definition. — Let be a ring and let be an -module. Say that a prime ideal of is associated to if there exists an element such that is minimal among all prime ideals containing .
We write (sometimes spelt out as “assassin”) for the set of all associated prime ideals of .
(Here, is the annihilator of , the ideal of all such that .)
There is a geometric way to intepret this definition: it means that in the spectrum , the irreducible closed set (of which is the generic point) is an irreducible component of . Thanks to this remark, associated prime ideals are compatible with localisation: where is identified as the subset of consisting of prime ideals which are disjoint from . In particular, is associated to if and only if the maximal ideal of the local ring is associated to the module .
Here is what the associated prime ideals mean, from the point view of module theory.
Proposition. — Let .
a) The multiplication by is injective in if and only if does not belong to any associated prime ideal of .
b) The localized module is zero if and only if belongs to all associated prime ideals of .
c) In particular, if and only if .
Proof. — a) If belongs to the associated prime ideal , then belongs to the associated prime ideal of , which means that there exists such that is the only prime ideal containing . Consequently, is nilpotent modulo and there exists and such that . Take a minimal such . Since , one has ; then , while and the homothety is not injective. Conversely, if is not injective, take in such that ; the annihilator is not equal to , hence ; take an irreducible component of this closed subset — equivalently a minimal prime ideal among those containing ; one has , hence .
b) follows from c), with .
c) The module is zero if and only if the multiplication by is injective on . By a), this is equivalent to the fact that is empty.
Corollary. — A prime ideal is in the support of if and only if it contains some associated prime ideal.
The prime ideal belongs to the support of if and only if , if and only if is not empty, if and only if there exists an associated prime ideal of which belongs to , that is, is contained in .
For noetherian rings, one has the following characterization of associated prime ideals, which is usually taken at their definition.
Theorem. — Let be a noetherian ring and be an -module. A prime ideal of is associated to if and only if there exists such that .
If , then is associated to . Conversely, let and let be a minimal prime ideal of among those containing . We first assume that is local with maximal ideal ; then is the only prime ideal of that contains , which implies that any element of is nilpotent modulo . Since is finitely generated (because is noetherian), there exists an integer such that . Take a minimal such . Since , one has ; then so that there exists such that . Then for every , so that , and because . Consequently, . In the general case, we use the case of a local ring to obtain such that . Consequently, , and for every , there exists such that . Using that is finitely generated, one finds such that for every ; then , as was to be shown.
From that point on, both presentations converge. One deduces from the preceding theorem that if is noetherian and is finitely generated, there exists a composition series , with successive quotients of the form , for some prime ideals of , and then is contained in , in view of the following lemma. In particular, is finite.
Lemma. — Let be an -module and let be a submodule of ; then .
The first inclusion follows from the definition. Let us prove the second one. Let and let be such that is a minimal prime ideal of among those containing . Let be the image of in . If contains , then is also minimal among such prime ideals, hence . Otherwise, there exists such that . Let us prove that is minimal among the prime ideals containing . First of all, let ; then , hence , hence since . Since , it also follows that is minimal among the prime ideals containing . Since , one has , hence and .