Wednesday, November 11, 2015

When Baire meets Krasner


Here is a well-but-ought-to-be-better known theorem.

Theorem. — Let \ell be a prime number and let GG be a compact subgroup of GLd(Q)\mathop{\rm GL}_d(\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell}). Then there exists a finite extension EE of Q\mathbf Q_\ell such that GG is contained in GLd(E)\mathop{\rm GL}_d(E).

Before explaining its proof, let us recall why such a theorem can be of any interest at all. The keyword here is Galois representations.

It is now a well-established fact that linear representations are an extremly useful tool to study groups. This is standard for finite groups, for which complex linear representations appear at one point or another of graduate studies, and its topological version is even more classical for the abelian groups R/Z\mathbf R/\mathbf Z (Fourier series) and R\mathbf R (Fourier integrals). On the other hand, some groups are extremly difficult to grasp while their representations are ubiquitous, namely the absolute Galois groups GK=Gal(K/K)G_K=\operatorname{Gal}(\overline K/K) of fields KK.

With the notable exception of real closed fields, these groups are  infinite and have a natural (profinite) topology with open subgroups the groups Gal(K/L)\operatorname{Gal}(\overline K/L), where LL is a finite extension of KK lying in K\overline K. It is therefore important to study their continuous linear representations. Complex representations are important but since GKG_K is totally discontinuous, their image is always finite. Therefore, \ell-adic representations, namely continuous morphisms from GKG_K to GLd(Q)\mathop{\rm GL}_d(\mathbf Q_\ell), are more important. Here Q\mathbf Q_\ell is the field of \ell-adic numbers.

Their use goes back to Weil's proof of the Riemann hypothesis for curves over finite fields, via the action on \ell^\infty-division points of its Jacobian variety. Here \ell is a prime different from the characteristic of the ground field. More generally, every Abelian variety AA over a field KK of characteristic \neq\ell gives rise to a Tate module T(A)T_\ell(A) which is a free Z\mathbf Z_\ell-module of rank d=2dim(A)d=2\dim(A), endowed with a continuous action ρA,\rho_{A,\ell} of  GKG_K. Taking a basis of T(A)T_\ell(A), one thus has a continuous morphism GKGLd(Z)G_K\to \mathop{\rm GL}_d(\mathbf Z_\ell), and, embedding Z\mathbf Z_\ell in the field of \ell-adic numbers,  a continuous morphism GKGLd(Q)G_K\to\mathop{\rm GL}_d(\mathbf Q_\ell). Even more generally, one can consider the \ell-adic étale cohomology of algebraic varieties over KK.

For various reasons, such as the need to diagonalize additional group actions, one can be led to consider similar representations where Q\mathbf Q_\ell is replaced by a finite extension of Q\mathbf Q_\ell, or even by the algebraic closure Q\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell}. Since GKG_K is a compact topological groups, its image by a continuous representation ρ ⁣:GKGLd(Q\rho\colon G_K\to\mathop{\rm GL}_d(\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell} is a compact subgroup of GLd(Q\mathop{\rm GL}_d(\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell} to which the above theorem applies.

This being said for the motivation, one proof (attributed to Warren Sinnott)  is given by Keith Conrad in his short note, Compact subgroups of GLn(Qp){\rm GL}_n(\overline{\mathbf Q}_p). In fact, while browsing at his large set of excellent expository notes,  I fell on that one and felt urged to write this blog post.

The following proof had been explained to me by Jean-Benoît Bost almost exactly 20 years ago. I believe that it ought to be much more widely known.

It relies on the Baire category theorem and on Krasner's lemma.

Lemma 1 (essentially Baire). — Let GG be a compact topological group and let (Gn)(G_n) be an increasing sequence of closed subgroups of GG such that Gn=G\bigcup G_n=G. There exists an integer nn such that Gn=GG_n=G.

Proof. Since GG is compact Hausdorff, it satisfies the Baire category theorem and there exists an integer mm such that GmG_m contains a non-empty open subset VV. For every gVg\in V, then Vg1V\cdot g^{-1} is an open neighborhood of identity contained in GmG_m. This shows that GnG_n is open in GG. Since GG is compact, it has finitely many cosets giGmg_iG_m modulo GmG_m; there exists an integer nmn\geq m such that giGng_i\in G_n for every ii, hence G=GnG=G_n. QED.

Lemma 2 (essentially Krasner). — For every integer dd, the set of all extensions of Q\mathbf Q_\ell of degree dd, contained in Q\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell}, is finite.

Proof. Every finite extension of Q\mathbf Q_\ell has a primitive element whose minimal polynomial can be taken monic and with coefficients in Z\mathbf Z_\ell; its degree is the degree of the polynomial. On the other hand, Krasner's lemma asserts that for every such irreducible polynomial PP, there exist a real number cPc_P for every monic polynomial QQ such that the coefficients of QPQ-P have absolute values <cP<c_P, then QQ has a root in the field EP=Q[T]/(P)E_P=\mathbf Q_\ell[T]/(P). By compactness of Z\mathbf Z_\ell, the set of all finite subextensions of given degree of Q\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell} is finite. QED.

Let us now give the proof of the theorem. Let (En)(E_n) be a increasing sequence of finite subextensions of Q\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell} such that Q=nEn\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell}=\bigcup_n E_n (lemma 2; take for EnE_n the subfield generated by En1E_{n-1} and all the subextensions of degree nn of Q\overline{\mathbf Q_\ell}). Then Gn=GGLd(En)G_n=G\cap \mathop{\rm GL}_d(E_n) is a closed subgroup of GG, and GG is the increasing union of all GnG_n. By lemma 1, there exists an integer nn such that Gn=GG_n=G. QED.